Oh - and what really kills me is that all my custom icons show up find
in the left sidebar legend when you look at the KML in google maps
(http://maps.google.com/?q=http://www.lre-projects.net/UDFCD/ahps/
includes/lre/kml/udfcd_alert_current.kml) even when they are not
displaying in the map itself. ??  ~Kelly

On Mar 2, 2:51 pm, Kelly Close <kelly.cl...@lrewater.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm wondering if people have had more luck finding a way to get 
> thecustomicons in a KML to display reliably when using the Maps API v3?
> I just added the version parameter to my code (I tried both 3.6 and
> 3.7) rather than letting it use the nightly build, but alas, it did
> not seem to have an effect.
>
> Here is a link to my map within the Maps API page (development version
> - I might be working on 
> it!):http://www.lre-projects.net/UDFCD/ahps/includes/lre/ahpsmap.html
> Here is a link to the 
> KML:http://www.lre-projects.net/UDFCD/ahps/includes/lre/kml/udfcd_alert_c...
>
> On any given day all thecustomicons may appear or they may not, or
> they may partially.  Refreshing may result in differentcustomicons
> displaying than before.  Yesterday it was perfect, all day - I wish I
> could reference THAT particular nightly build and see if that was the
> reason!  But my guess is that it wasn't - I still have not seen a
> pattern in when the icons display and when they don't, and I've been
> experimenting with this now since last October, but I'm starting to
> think it really just boils down to response time, google's tight time-
> out constraints, and the load on the internet "pipes" involved in
> moving my data around.
>
> I have tried moving the KML and/or cutom icon .png files around to
> different servers, the fastest ones I can get my hands on, including
> Google's own servers (google sites file sharing page).  All location
> combinations have worked intermittently, and none noticably better
> than others over time.
>
> The reliability of the icons does seem better for a day or so after
> each move to a new location, making me wonder if Google's caching has
> something to do with it (I am using a timestamp parameter appended to
> my KML call to overcome the KML caching, but what about thecustom
> icon file caching?).  I've tried relative paths to icon files that sit
> in the same web folder as the KML.  I've tried full url paths to the
> files, on the same server as the KML and on a different server from
> the KML.  I think I have better luck when I keep the PNG files in the
> same folder as the KML and use relative paths, but it's hard to tell.
>
> Anyway, I'd love to hear if anyone more ideas for me to try!  Thanks.
>
> ~Kelly
>
> On Feb 14, 11:36 am, Pil <wolf...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> > On Feb 14, 3:23 pm, "geocode...@gmail.com"
>
> > > That is all well and good.  But specifying v=3.6 on a local copy of
> > > that page shows all themarkers, while the nightly build does not.
>
> >  Lesser fault tolerance is often better, more stable and more robust.
> > Try to replace the id attributes with class attributes.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Google Maps JavaScript API v3" group.
To post to this group, send email to google-maps-js-api-v3@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
google-maps-js-api-v3+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/google-maps-js-api-v3?hl=en.

Reply via email to