Thanks - so is there a documentation page on this format? On Sep 15, 5:00 am, "Jeff Fisher (Google)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi, > > Yes, the current format is ugly. It is basically a 1:1 conversion from > the Java client library. We have been kicking around the idea of a > cleaner JSON format designed to be compact in the way one would > expect. I've added a feature request to our public issue tracker that > you can star for updates: > > http://code.google.com/p/gdata-issues/issues/detail?id=768 > > Cheers, > -Jeff > > On Sep 12, 11:25 pm, "David J. Burger" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > I've been doing some beginning experiments with retrieving picasa data > > with javascript in the browser. One example uses Google Ajax feeds > > API and can be found here: > > >http://www2.hawaii.edu/~dburger/demos/goog-picasa/goog-feeds.html > > > The second example uses ODJ (on demand javascript) with a callback > > function. That example can be found here: > > >http://www2.hawaii.edu/~dburger/demos/goog-picasa/goog-callback.html > > > The second example works by appending a script tag to the head of the > > page with the feed URL and the query parameters ?alt=json-in- > > script&callback=handleResult at the end of the feed URL. > > > My questions pertain to the second example and are: > > > 1) why is the format of the returned JSON so ugly and hard to work > > with - is it possible to get a cleaner response? > > 2) if that is the best JSON I can get, is that format documented > > somewhere? > > > Thanks in advance.
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google Picasa Web Albums API" group. To post to this group, send email to Google-Picasa-Data-API@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Picasa-Data-API?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
