Hi Coldspring,
You might check out what Google has to say about new languages on
their FAQ:
http://www.google.com/intl/en/help/faq_translation.html#newlangs
Best,
Josh
On Feb 6, 10:10 am, Coldspring wrote:
> I am wondering why all languages around the world even little
> countries which are not even as big as a province in Iran have their
> language included in Google Translate (i.e. Maltan...). Not that I
> have any problem with that, but why Parsi is not there! Persian
> Language is one of the first languages in the world which like modern
> languages have had 32 letters and was an International language
> thousands of years ago. All the merchants along the Silk Road knew
> Persian as it was and easy language for communication between nations
> and trade purposes versus Chinese, Babylonian, Egyptians which used to
> have over 100-200 letters. All the world if some one new Persian could
> get by. In India, Greece and etc.. Persian was the second language.
> Persians also wrote grammar for Arabic and simplified it like Persian
> after Arabs invasions and the fact that they were forced to switch to
> Arabic from Parsi, they basically had to make it usable for their
> scientific and literal writing. Aviccena, Biruni, Al Khwarizmi and all
> the Persian scientists wrote their materials in Arabic so they had to
> make it first useable!
>
> Besides, Persi is a the only language which was revived after Arabs
> conquest in the middle-est. It survived Helenic and Mongolian
> invasions as well.
>
> Now all these languages are ahead and Parsi is not even in the
> picture, why? Simply because my nation wasn't violent to force their
> language or religion to other nations when they were in power.
>
> I will not rest before Parsi in added to Google Translate, as well as
> all other applications.
