2009/5/12 VizGuy <[email protected]> > Hi, >
Hi, > > So what we changed lately is that we removed the support of the original > _undocumented_ protocol that was used before last November, when we > published the protocol. > Ok, but is not easy to understand that _undocumented_ means not supported, still more when the original protocol works, and when the whole project is under a deep development. So its not that we removed a support for some documented feature, and broke > some thing that should be backward compatible. > In addition, this change was in the test servers for a few days. > We have been using version 1.0, so we suppose that there is no reason to test our code. > So now the best approach will be to read the documentation about the > current format of the request and response, and making sure you are using a > valid notation. > Even if there will be new versions, this one will not break. > I think that you could warn about these changes, still more when apply over the production version, even when are fully reasonable. > Again - Note that the changes are: > reqId instead of requestId > c: for the rows > use of words instead of single letters for column types. > Thank you, Felipe --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google Visualization API" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-visualization-api?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
