Added here. Please vote for this if you want to see it fixed. http://code.google.com/p/google-visualization-api-issues/issues/detail?id=625
On Jun 20, 11:35 am, Riccardo Govoni <[email protected]> wrote: > I see your point. Yes, I too think it would be reasonable for the > data.group() operator to propagate ids and labels forward when it's obvious > they won't change. On the spot I can't think of a reason why this shouldn't > happen. > > /R. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google Visualization API" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-visualization-api?hl=en.
