As far as I know, there's indeed a performance problem with scatter chart
with many (hundreds) points on IE7/8.
In the last release we've made significant performance improvements for line
charts (where the points are invisible by default, and show up only on
hover), and so slower browsers (IE7/8) were brought to a state of reasonable
performance. For scatter charts, however, where all the points are always
visible, performance was improved, but not enough, so there's still a
problem.

On Tue, Oct 4, 2011 at 1:10 AM, NA <[email protected]> wrote:

> Are you sure it's the rendering process?  In the tests that I've run
> (ranging from hundreds to thousands of points), I didn't see much
> variance across browsers.  Some were faster than others, but all were
> in the same ballpark.  I wasn't using the scatterplots, though, so
> that may be significant (I used the line charts).
>
> Perhaps there's some other process that's slow on IE but fast on the
> others?  Maybe some data processing, filtering, perhaps even logging
> to the console?  (If the debug is closed on IE and you try to log
> messages, you may see a performance problem).
>
> I'm not saying there isn't a problem, but I just thought it might be
> worth checking to make sure it's the rendering part and not something
> else, as that would be more consistent with what I've seen.
>
> hth
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "Google Visualization API" group.
> To post to this group, send email to
> [email protected].
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> [email protected].
> For more options, visit this group at
> http://groups.google.com/group/google-visualization-api?hl=en.
>
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Google Visualization API" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/google-visualization-api?hl=en.

Reply via email to