On Thursday, 27 September 2012 21:01:24 UTC+2, trybka wrote:
> You're quite right, it is the date parsing.
>
> Your 2013 dates lack a leading zero on the month ('1' vs '01').
> If you fix that, it will be parsed consistently with your other dates.
>
If I could kiss you now, I would! Thank you! And sorry for reporting this
as a bug. I actually did try creating Date objects using Internet Explorer
in Firebug Lite, since I thought that might be the bug, but I guess I was
lucky with which date strings I tested (or unlucky, depending on your
view)...
Big love to the internets
-
Carl-Erik
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Google Visualization API" group.
To view this discussion on the web visit
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/google-visualization-api/-/BSjS4bVWqUAJ.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/google-visualization-api?hl=en.