It is possible to do something like that, but it is not a good idea. As an example, assume you have two filters: A and B, using this data set:
A | B ---------- foo | cad foo | fiz bar | buzz The user selects "foo" from filter A. Filter B then contains the options "cad" and "fiz". If the user selects "cad" from filter B, this changes the contents of filter A to "foo" only, and the user can never select "bar" from filter A or "buzz" from filter B. Circular chained filters are a bad idea. On Monday, June 16, 2014 4:57:11 AM UTC-4, bob3321 wrote: > > thank you very much for your reply, > working from left to right, that is if I select a value from the filter1 > are updated values of the filter2 and filter3. > But if I select a value from the filter3 are not updated filter1 and > filter2. > That's fine too, it's not a big deal, but do you think there is also the > possibility to update the filters from right to left? > Thanks > > Il giorno giovedì 12 giugno 2014 21:36:20 UTC+2, Andrew Gallant ha scritto: >> >> You need to chain your filters together in the bind calls, eg: >> >> dashboard.bind([filter1], [filter2]); >> dashboard.bind([filter2], [filter3]); >> dashboard.bind([filter3], [table]); >> >> On Thursday, June 12, 2014 9:27:13 AM UTC-4, bob3321 wrote: >>> >>> Hello everyone, >>> I have a table chart with three category filter connect by a dashboard. >>> Each category filter is connected to a column of the table. >>> I wish that when I select an item from the filter, and then update the >>> table, also update automatically other category filter >>> Is it possible? >>> >>> thanks >>> >> -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google Visualization API" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-visualization-api. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
