Understood. Thanks for the idea, the details, and the quick answer, Daniel.
Best, Juanje. El lunes, 17 de abril de 2017, 16:57:33 (UTC+2), Daniel LaLiberte escribió: > > Currently, if the item boxes are less than 4 pixels tall, I believe that > is when it forces the decision to use a solid column. The gap between > items means that there would need to be at least 2 pixels per box, but it > starts looking funky below 4, hence this seemed like a reasonable default. > > If we used a gradient of colors instead of the boxes, we could get as low > as 1 pixel per item. But actually, we wouldn't need to distinguish the > items visually at all, and hovering could still show the tooltip for the > corresponding item. > > Until we make a change, you could possibly work around this by using a > larger number of smaller buckets. If the buckets are half as wide, the > height will tend to be twice as high. > > On Mon, Apr 17, 2017 at 7:58 AM, Juan Jesus <[email protected] > <javascript:>> wrote: > >> Hi all, >> I'm currently using an histogram, and I have detected that when the >> number of items in a bucket is large, the bars change to a single block >> with a tooltip saying "items:206" (for example). >> >> >> <https://lh3.googleusercontent.com/-MzCl7BVM6FQ/WPSsga2JFnI/AAAAAAAAmRo/Q4ggBcFthcY5lyDDqpa2y6vS0KfW08h8QCLcB/s1600/Captura%2Bde%2Bpantalla%2Bde%2B2017-04-17%2B13%253A51%253A51.png> >> >> I want to retain the default behaviour of showing individual stacked >> items in each bucket, like this: >> >> >> <https://lh3.googleusercontent.com/-PzDTM4vR7-E/WPStCGEX_rI/AAAAAAAAmRs/6-xh8PusnggKJrtpq_Wxrtslqz3c4O9YgCLcB/s1600/Captura%2Bde%2Bpantalla%2Bde%2B2017-04-17%2B13%253A54%253A34.png> >> >> >> since, among other things, I'm using the individual item tooltips and >> events for navigation to an item details screen. Is there any way to >> achieve this? I'm already using the hideBucketItems: false property to no >> result... >> >> I've seen this question >> <https://groups.google.com/forum/#!searchin/google-visualization-api/individual$20items%7Csort:relevance/google-visualization-api/2X98FcR_Rvs/j8i6NQ8ZAgAJ> >> >> about something similar, but not useful answers... >> >> Thanks in advance! >> >> >> -- >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups >> "Google Visualization API" group. >> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an >> email to [email protected] >> <javascript:>. >> To post to this group, send email to [email protected] >> <javascript:>. >> Visit this group at >> https://groups.google.com/group/google-visualization-api. >> To view this discussion on the web visit >> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/google-visualization-api/946c1f11-d3f3-4ecf-a5d7-c8ac6972e332%40googlegroups.com >> >> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/google-visualization-api/946c1f11-d3f3-4ecf-a5d7-c8ac6972e332%40googlegroups.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer> >> . >> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. >> > > > > -- > Daniel LaLiberte <https://plus.google.com/100631381223468223275?prsrc=2> > [email protected] <javascript:> 5CC, Cambridge MA > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google Visualization API" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/google-visualization-api. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/google-visualization-api/a85ee896-5c34-45c6-8e93-c82dbed5ea29%40googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
