If you're having trouble building the reference implementation, that discussion is off-topic here. Please search the history of the Wave Protocol discussion group, and bring it up there if your problem is new:
http://groups.google.com/group/wave-protocol Kind regards, Andrey On Mon, Oct 5, 2009 at 10:49 AM, Josef Maier <[email protected]>wrote: > Why I'm so sure that you haven't tried yourself to build a closed delivery > chain based on the modules that you've mentioned yet? Maybe because I did. > But before this thread goes into more accusations, I propose to close it. > There was no constructive solution yet, neither an answer from Google. I > lost enough time with trying to get an account already... > > *p.s.: regarding your comment I recomment reading > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Snob (who is the "inferior" here... who has > the "account" here?) > * > > 2009/10/5 Joe Developer <[email protected]> > >> Awww. >> >> ... >> > Or better - let me ask the question in a different way: Is there any way >>> to set up a Wave server independently, just to get around this >>> hype-creating, limiting, psycho-bubble thing so-called "developer-preview" >>> right now? Just that any developer really interested in could create his own >>> accounts & see what he can really *develop* with it? >>> >> >> Yes, if you exert your software development foo and do a quick search >> through these groups you will find quite a few references to 'federation >> reference server', 'federation protocol' and 'Opensource wave projects' . >> >> > > > > > > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google Wave API" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-wave-api?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
