PS. me is suppose to be alexandrojv, I forgot to replace that
On Oct 29, 10:48 pm, "pamela (Google Employee)" <[email protected]>
wrote:
> Pamela (and Austin Chau, me):
>
> [CLOSED] Office Hours: 10-29-2009 {HALLOWEEN EDITION}
>
> Welcome to API office hours!
>
> *Please top post your question or comment about the robot, gadget, or embed
> API to make sure we see it. You can do so by replying to this blip.*
>
> *A transcript of this wave will be made publicly available. If you don't
> want to appear in the transcript, delete your blip after getting a response.
> Be careful not to remove neighboring blips.*
>
> *And don't add robots to this wave!*
>
> 12:04 am
>
> me:
>
> This wave had problems at the begining so it continued on: [CLOSED] Office
> Hours: 10-29-2009 {HALLOWEEN EDITION}
>
> Oct 28
>
> me:
>
> Spooky! alright I have a couple of questions from people in the Preview that
> don't have access to the Sandbox
>
> Oct 28
>
> Pamela:
>
> Okay. I assume they requested access in the last few weeks?
>
> Oct 28
>
> me:
>
> This one is from JugglingWJ Why can't you remove people from Waves?
>
> Oct 28
>
> Pamela:
>
> It's not implemented yet.
>
> 12:02 am
>
> me:
>
> fair enough
>
> Oct 28
>
> Brett Morgan:
>
> since when did sandbox wind up on wave.google.com? =)
>
> And why is my user pic gone missing. damn it. I don't like being a faceless
> entity.
>
> Oct 28
>
> Pamela:
>
> Testestetst
>
> Oct 28
>
> James Purser:
>
> heloooo
>
> 10:12 am
>
> Janice Talbert:
>
> i can't see to edit/change my user icon. what'append?
>
> ****Second version of Office Hours since there were technical problems:****
>
> 11:47 amPamela (and Scott Edmonds):
>
> [CLOSED] Office Hours: 10-29-2009 {HALLOWEEN EDITION}
>
> Welcome to API office hours!
>
> *Please top post your question or comment about the robot, gadget, or embed
> API to make sure we see it. You can do so by replying to this blip.*
>
> *A transcript of this wave will be made publicly available. If you don't
> want to appear in the transcript, delete your blip after getting a response.
> Be careful not to remove neighboring blips.*
>
> *And don't add robots to this wave!*
>
> me:
>
> And another from mort___ when will authenticated gadget makeRequest() be
> supported?
>
> Oct 28
>
> Pamela:
>
> At the recent meetups in the last few days, we stated that makeRequest() is
> on our (most immediate) roadmap.
>
> Oct 28
>
> me:
>
> so soon I suppose
>
> Oct 28
>
> Austin Chau:
>
> Yes we are prioritizing that.
>
> Oct 28
>
> me:
>
> Awesome thanks
>
> Oct 28
>
> Pamela:
>
> I've filed it here for your tracking
> pleasure:http://code.google.com/p/google-wave-resources/issues/detail?id=366
>
> Oct 28
>
> me:
>
> great thanks
>
> Oct 28
>
> Pamela:
>
> You asked about getting a wave ID for a gadget - I've filed that
> here:http://code.google.com/p/google-wave-resources/issues/detail?id=367
>
> Oct 28
>
> me:
>
> @Pamela: You had said in the second to last Office Hour that you had an idea
> in mind for the feature I was trying to do for my Robot: In order to have
> the robot respond with a way for some one to give the answer a thumbs up or
> not / give the answer a rating that we can follow to know if the robot is
> giving it a good answer or not.
>
> So do you still remember what you had in mind?
>
> Oct 28
>
> Pamela:
>
> I'm not sure I recall that, but it seems like you would want the robot to
> insert a thumbs up gadget, and the robot could listen to whether the user
> clicked it or not.
>
> Oct 28
>
> me:
>
> yeah that would be an option, but is it possible to "hear" what the
> responces are?
>
> Oct 28
>
> Pamela (and Wavelinker):
>
> Yes, the robot can listen to DOCUMENT_CHANGED, and then look at the new
> state. The row of four sample does that in
> Python:http://wave-samples-gallery.appspot.com/about_app?app_id=36022
>
> Oct 28
>
> me:
>
> ok I'll take a look at the coding behind the robot if I can and see waht
> they are doing there. thanks
>
> Oct 28
>
> me:
>
> How come the Extension Installer Gadget Install doesn't work in the test
> account? for me it crashes the wave
>
> Oct 28
>
> Pamela:
>
> In Sandbox?
>
> Oct 28
>
> me:
>
> yes
>
> Oct 28
>
> Pamela:
>
> You mean the extension that lets you easily insert installers, right?
> (Sorry, our naming is confusing).
>
> Oct 28
>
> me:
>
> yes that's the one, I know
>
> Oct 28
>
> Pamela:
>
> Let me check.
>
> Oct 28
>
> me:
>
> alright thanks, for some reason the same wave with that gadget installer on
> shared with the test account doesn't work on the test one, but on the
> regular one it does
>
> Oct 28
>
> Pamela:
>
> It seems to work for me -added you to Wave with it:
>
> https://wave.google.com/a/wavesandbox.com/#restored:wave:wavesandbox....
>
> Oct 28
>
> me:
>
> right, let me add my test account and try again
>
> Oct 28
>
> me:
>
> ok it does work now, I guess it was just something weird before thanks
>
> Oct 28
>
> James Purser:
>
> Afternoon all
>
> Oct 28
>
> Brett Morgan:
>
> hey bro
>
> Oct 28
>
> James Purser:
>
> So my question is basically this:
>
> How goes the opening up of the federation port :)
>
> Oct 28
>
> Austin Chau:
>
> it's an ongoing process as we speak :)
>
> Oct 28
>
> Brett Morgan:
>
> have you guys had any sleep this week? =)
>
> Oct 28
>
> Austin Chau:
>
> some of us did :)
>
> Oct 28
>
> James Purser:
>
> Excellent stuff, (sorry doing a client call right now).
>
> Oct 28
>
> Fabricio Zuardi:
>
> Am I writing in the correct place? :) (couldn’t top post)…
>
> anyways, my question is regarding testing different versions of the same
> robots using the App Engine versioning. As when you do
> ithttp://alpha1.latest.myappname.appspot.com/
>
> Oct 28
>
> Austin Chau:
>
> Unfortunately this is not possible at the moment, although I agree it's very
> useful.
>
> Oct 28
>
> Fabricio Zuardi:
>
> ok, is there a bug filed already?
>
> Oct 28
>
> Austin Chau:
>
> I don't believe so, feel free to file it here
> -http://code.google.com/p/google-wave-resources/issues/list?can=2&q=&s...
>
> When teh GAE requirement goes away it will be less important.
>
> Oct 28
>
> Fabricio Zuardi:
>
> yup.
>
> the deploy-everytime workflow is also annoying, but ok since the thing is
> very beta :)
>
> Oct 28
>
> Fabricio Zuardi:
>
> ok, will do that, thanks!
>
> 12:00 am
>
> Fabricio Zuardi:
>
> issue 368 created :)
>
> Oct 28
>
> Pamela:
>
> I would recommend registering for multiple app IDs, so that you can test new
> versions before pushing to users (if users are using your app).
>
> Oct 28
>
> Fabricio Zuardi:
>
> problem with that approach is that I am already near my appengine limit (2
> apps left)
>
> Oct 28
>
> Pamela:
>
> We can increase that, you can private reply your account username.
>
> Oct 28
>
> Fabricio Zuardi:
>
> ok, that would be awesome! doing that, just a sec…
>
> Oct 28
>
> Kazuyoshi Tlacaelel:
>
> @Pamela Thanks for all your feedback! can we access this waves with the cli
> client?
>
> Oct 28
>
> Pamela:
>
> What is the "cli client"?
>
> Oct 28
>
> Kazuyoshi Tlacaelel:
>
> the one that comes with the fedone distribution?
> "fedone-client-console-0.2.jar"
>
> Oct 28
>
> Pamela:
>
> Waves can't be accessed across wave servers yet, so no.
>
> Oct 28
>
> Kazuyoshi Tlacaelel:
>
> ahhh man! really!? lol well.. okay. Thanks!
>
> Oct 28
>
> Pamela:
>
> waveolantern
>
> Oct 28
>
> me:
>
> lol
>
> 12:05 am
>
> Kazuyoshi Tlacaelel:
>
> nice!
>
> 12:04 am
>
> Kazuyoshi Tlacaelel:
>
> Where will it be publicly available?
>
> 12:08 am
>
> me:
>
> They are always posted on:http://groups.google.com/group/google-wave-api
>
> 12:09 am
>
> Kazuyoshi Tlacaelel:
>
> thanks alex!
>
> Oct 28
>
> me:
>
> Next is from mort___ how/when can we get programmatic gadget access to the
> unique wave id?
>
> Oct 28
>
> Pamela:
>
> You could do so with a robot right now, but not within the gadget API.
>
> Oct 28
>
> me:
>
> do you know which robot exactly?
>
> Oct 28
>
> Pamela:
>
> I mean, a robot could insert a gadget, and the robot could inform the gadget
> about the ID of the Wave it's in.
>
> Oct 28
>
> Pamela:
>
> What's the use case that they're trying to use it for?
>
> Oct 28
>
> me:
>
> not really sure, I'll ask him, and see if he responds during this hour, but
> I guess this should answer his question
>
> Oct 28
>
> Pamela:
>
> Filed here:http://code.google.com/p/google-wave-resources/issues/detail?id=367
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Google Wave API" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/google-wave-api?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
