Regarding using robot to change gadget state, here is some more info on this that people may find useful:
1. Python robot is able to change gadget state. GadgetSubmitDelta() works when we tried it. 2. during office hour, Google mentions that Java robot does not have this problem on the new Java client. :) On Dec 10 2009, 5:57 pm, dougx <[email protected]> wrote: > I suggest using XSS to communicate directly with your server and don't > use the robot-gadget api. > > Here's an example of how to get the XSS > working;http://austinchau.blogspot.com/2008/11/html5-cross-document-messaging... > > Once you have that up and running collect robot triggered changes > server-side and poll the server using xss; then push the state changes > into the state from that gadget instance. > > Nb. Make sure you only pick one instance of the gadget to do the state > changes, or you'll get spammed to death on your server when lots of > people open the wave. > > (not a very nice solution, I know, but it works). > > ~ > Doug. > > On Dec 10, 6:09 pm, Solomon Wu <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > We are also hitting issue #406. When usingsetFieldto set gadget state, > > gadget does not receive the state change. Since we are trying to use it for > > robot-gadget interaction, the robot has to change gadget state in response > > to gadget state change. Is there a workaround? Thank you very > > much.http://code.google.com/p/google-wave-resources/issues/detail?id=406&q... > > Nov 17, 1:56 am, "pamela (Google Employee)" <[email protected]> wrote: > > > It does work, and many robots do so, but there > > > are some bugs filed about > cases where it does not work. For > > example:http://code.google.com/p/google-wave-resources/issues/list?can=2&q=se... > > > > > <http://code.google.com/p/google-wave-resources/issues/list?can=2&q=se...> > > >> > > On Mon, Nov 16, 2009 at 8:02 AM, Jacco <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > I think currently communicating from robot to gadget is not possible? > > > > > The gadget.setFielddoes not change the state of the gadget in my > > > > tests.> > > Regards, Jacco > > > On 12 nov, 16:48, just marvin < > > [email protected]> wrote: > > > It occurs to me that since you'll > > > need a bot and a gadget, you could > > > just have the bot add the gadget(s) > > to the wave. Then you just need > > > to add one thing to the wave and > > you'll know you have the correct > > > environment for the gadgets. > > > > > --> > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google > > > Groups > > "Google Wave API" group. > > To post to this group, send email to > > [email protected]. > > To unsubscribe from this group, send > > email to > > > > [email protected]<google-wave-api%2Bunsubscribe@ > > googlegroups.com> > > <google-wave-api%2Bunsubscribe@ googlegroups.com> > > . > > For more > > options, visit this group at > > > >http://groups.google.com/group/google-wave-api?hl=.
-- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google Wave API" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-wave-api?hl=en.
