My interpretation of the spec would say 'yes': given that a link is an annotation and that an image is an element that is part of a blip's line element, and that the line may be annotated.
In our implementation, we have included the attachment ID within the annotation data, and thus do not (currently) see the use of an 'independent' image element... HTH Chris -- iotawave.org -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google Wave API" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-wave-api?hl=en.
