On 8 фев, 07:22, "pamela (Google Employee)" <[email protected]> wrote: > My idea - > > If it was done strictly as a gadget, then the gadget would just store > the time that a timer started, and the duration of the timer. Then, > the wave would only be updated when someone set a new timer -- which > makes sense to me. > The actual time countdown would be done in Javascript, and be based on > a calculation of the start time, current time, and timer duration. > > - pamela
Ah! You mean, that the (image of timer) should be updated locally by local javascript? Here i see two more issues: - when some new user opens a gadget, timer may show some drift if the users clock differs from installer clock. - someone still have to update timer state to "time over", for instance to alarm robot to put '[CLOSED]' in wavelet title. it's quite -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google Wave API" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-wave-api?hl=en.
