Actually, I was just thinking the same thing. I will try it when I have time.
On 2月15日, 午後3:45, Chris <[email protected]> wrote: > Nifty. ;) I think you could theoretically make a registration system out of > that, with the database being stored in a private wave owned by the bot. > > In ALL things, strive for ><>, > Chris > > > > On Mon, Feb 15, 2010 at 12:37 AM, technohippy <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hi all, > > I made a simple library to host more than one robots on one gae slot. > >http://reviewmycode.blogspot.com/2010/02/google-wave-robot-multiplexe... > > Hope this helps. > > > ANDO Yasushi > > > -- > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > > "Google Wave API" group. > > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > > [email protected]<google-wave-api%2Bunsubscribe@ > > googlegroups.com> > > . > > For more options, visit this group at > >http://groups.google.com/group/google-wave-api?hl=en. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google Wave API" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-wave-api?hl=en.
