Hi, thank you for your responses. Yes, it is actualy what I did already. The ALL context is also not a good approach for every case (it is good for SELF_ADDED) because it can cause a big amount of transfered data. Anyway, the feature of having private data document for certain user/robot would be great. But maybe it is not about the API but the protocol - I am not sure.
Thank you Roman On Feb 25, 12:39 am, "pamela (Google Employee)" <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi Roman- > > It's hard to predict what the API will look like for interacting and > creating private replies, since that capability doesn't yet exist. The > upcoming API does let developers specify an "ALL" context to retrieve all > the data in a wave, so that itself should not be a restriction. > > I would recommend using the datastore for now, and storing the wave_id in > each entity for easy retrieval. > > - pamelaOn Sat, Feb 20, 2010 at 8:18 PM, Roman <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hi, > > > yes, the data should be private, i.e. not viewable by other users or > > robots. > > > When the robot will be able to do the private reply, will the "private > > reply" data document be present in all following robot requests for > > whole wave? Probably not, since the context of robot's capability can > > be just PARENT, CHILD and SIBLING. Or will it be possible to make a > > special call from robot (during event handling) to wave, to get the > > "private reply"? > > > Thank you > > Roman > > > On Feb 18, 1:01 am, "pamela (Google Employee)" <[email protected]> > > wrote: > > > Hey Roman - > > > > Does the data need to be private, i.e. not viewable by other users? > > > > Once developers can make private replies in the API (which is certainly > > > planned for some point in the future), you can set data documents on a > > > private reply. > > > > - pamela > > > > On Fri, Feb 12, 2010 at 3:06 AM, Roman <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > Hi, > > > > I am currently working on a robot and has a need to store some data > > > > which are related to user (modifier), but the robot is the only one > > > > who wants to read and update them (so really like a cookie). > > > > I know I can store the data to the DataStore, but I prefer to get the > > > > data with every event, same way as the data document is part of every > > > > request to robot. > > > > Is there such feature? > > > > Is it planned to provide such feature? > > > > > Thank you > > > > Roman > > > > > -- > > > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google > > Groups > > > > "Google Wave API" group. > > > > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > > > > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > > > > [email protected]<google-wave-api%2Bunsubscribe@ > > > > googlegroups.com> > > <google-wave-api%2Bunsubscribe@ googlegroups.com> > > > > . > > > > For more options, visit this group at > > > >http://groups.google.com/group/google-wave-api?hl=en. > > > -- > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > > "Google Wave API" group. > > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > > [email protected]<google-wave-api%2Bunsubscribe@ > > googlegroups.com> > > . > > For more options, visit this group at > >http://groups.google.com/group/google-wave-api?hl=en. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google Wave API" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-wave-api?hl=en.
