Won't you still have handle storage and routing all traffic through
your own server when using Federation? This is what I'm trying to
avoid.

On Mar 13, 9:35 pm, Nicolas Toublanc <n.toubl...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Or an open source Web Wave client implementation?
>
> Actually, we have the following projects in open-source:
>
>    - servers:
>       - FedOne (initiated by Google):
>      
> http://code.google.com/p/wave-protocol/wiki/<http://code.google.com/p/wave-protocol/wiki/FedOne>
>       FedOne <http://code.google.com/p/wave-protocol/wiki/FedOne>
>       - PygoWave:http://pygowave.net
>    - clients:
>       - Console client (initiated by Google) :
>      http://code.google.com/p/wave-protocol/wiki/ConsoleClient
>       - PygoWave Desktop client :http://pygowave.net/blog/?p=117
>
> None of theses projects is usable as official closed-source project is.
>
> However, they are in active development (FedOne just got persistence via an
> external contribution) and very interesting project.
>
> Why don't share libraries with theses projects and create a new web-app UI?
>
> On Sat, Mar 13, 2010 at 9:13 PM, Joe Gregorio <j...@bitworking.org> wrote:
> > It sounds like what you want is Google Wave Federation, which is
> > described here:
>
> >    http://www.waveprotocol.org/
>
> >    Thanks,
> >    -joe
>
> > --
> > Joe Gregorio
> > Developer Relations, Google Wave
>
> > On Wed, Mar 10, 2010 at 1:31 PM, trond <tolse...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> >> This is probably outside the scope of Google Wave, but have there been
> >> any thoughts about opening up communications with Google Wave "to the
> >> outside". I'm not thinking about robots that automate stuff, but
> >> letting users manipulate their Wave data in other javascript/client
> >> applications. Like using Google Wave as a generic storage solution.
> >> Now, I do see some obvious problems like introducing unknown
> >> dataformats etc., but I really think this could be a good
> >> "collaborative storage solution" for all kinds of web-applications to
> >> work against. Though it's maybe not what Google Wave is about. :)
>
> >> --
> >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> >> "Google Wave API" group.
> >> To post to this group, send email to google-wave-...@googlegroups.com.
> >> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> >> google-wave-api+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com<google-wave-api%2bunsubscr...@googlegroups.com>
> >> .
> >> For more options, visit this group at
> >>http://groups.google.com/group/google-wave-api?hl=en.
>
> >  --
> > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> > "Google Wave API" group.
> > To post to this group, send email to google-wave-...@googlegroups.com.
> > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> > google-wave-api+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com<google-wave-api%2bunsubscr...@googlegroups.com>
> > .
> > For more options, visit this group at
> >http://groups.google.com/group/google-wave-api?hl=en.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Google Wave API" group.
To post to this group, send email to google-wave-...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
google-wave-api+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/google-wave-api?hl=en.

Reply via email to