But participants may want to be able to remove themselves. So my robot
only re-adds two robots at the moment (that are needed for my
application to function correctly).

On Jun 11, 8:41 am, Nathanael Abbotts <[email protected]>
wrote:
> One test you should include - check if the person removed themselves (for i
> in event.participants_removed: if i != event.modified_by: add(i) )
>
> On 10 June 2010 22:42, Anders <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > I have written a robot that re-adds participants. It works really
> > great! When one of the participants that gets re-added is removed by a
> > user the robot instantly adds it back again. Within a fraction of a
> > second. This hopefully solves the problem with keeping the waves
> > public. An improvement would be to be able to set a filter so that my
> > robot only gets called for those particular robots (only two at the
> > moment) that I want to re-add. Because as it is now my robot of course
> > gets called every time a participant is added or removed. That's a
> > minor problem and will only become a larger problem if lots of people
> > would use my application.
>
> > --
> > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> > "Google Wave API" group.
> > To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
> > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> > [email protected]<google-wave-api%[email protected]>
> > .
> > For more options, visit this group at
> >http://groups.google.com/group/google-wave-api?hl=en.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Google Wave API" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/google-wave-api?hl=en.

Reply via email to