On Tue, Sep 9, 2008 at 1:24 PM, John Tamplin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> On Tue, Sep 9, 2008 at 1:11 PM, Scott Blum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> What was misplaced about this?
>>
>
> The break needs to happen if a plugin was successfully found rather than if
> an error occurred trying to initialize it.
>

I don't understand.  If a plugin was found but failed to connect, and we
call the module load error function, why would we continue iterating through
the list?  Once you've found a plugin that loads, that's the right plugin;
just because it fails to connect doesn't mean you should keep trying, does
it?

Or did something fundamentally change and we need to rethink the load
process?


>
>
>> By the way, we're at a point now where changes to the OOPHM branch need to
>> be reviewed.
>>
>
> This was to changes/jat/oophm-trunk-r3274, not branches/oophm.  I am trying
> to get Sam's code, which predates the JSNI rewrite, working there before
> porting it to the new branch.
>

Gotcha.

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to