> Yep, that is actually my point - that the compiler is smart enough > to aggressively get rid of unused code, so the defaults will be completely > dropped in favor of your custom code.
You lost me here. I think I misunderstand something. If the compiler get ride of the overridden code, "causing code bloat" isn't a reason to not allow subclassing like you mention above, not? On Sep 25, 5:26 pm, "Emily Crutcher" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > do not cause code bloat. > > Isn't the GWT compiler smart enough to overcome this? > > I hope so. I have a quite a lot of gwt classes and many subclasses for > > simple OO reasons :( > > Yep, that is actually my point - that the compiler is smart enough > to aggressively get rid of unused code, so the defaults will be completely > dropped in favor of your custom code. --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
