LGTM On Tue, Sep 30, 2008 at 5:26 PM, John Tamplin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 30, 2008 at 4:51 PM, Freeland Abbott < > [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> But, again, it's a nit: my way saves at most ~10b of code size and could >> gain or lose a few miliseconds in execution time depending on whether branch >> prediction in the JVM is so far below bytecode interpretation that misses >> appear free; your way is type-safe for a constant that's both clearly >> documented as an integral value and likely to change exactly once in its >> coded lifetime. What color dresses are the angels on that pin wearing? >> > > Ok, try this patch. > > -- > John A. Tamplin > Software Engineer (GWT), Google > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
