+1 For one thing, it lets UI templates set their values without requiring custom parsers. Something like four different people have inspected the code for problems at this point and found none. rjrjr
On Mon, Oct 6, 2008 at 12:44 PM, Emily Crutcher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > +1 to > public boolean isAutoHideEnabled() > public boolean isModal() > > Why do we want to change whether auto hide/modality is enabled on an > existing popup panel? It seems like if we do this we would need to check > for edge cases that currently don't come up. > > > On Mon, Oct 6, 2008 at 12:09 PM, Alex Rudnick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> >> +1, sounds like a good idea. >> >> On Mon, Oct 6, 2008 at 11:54 AM, Jason Essington >> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> > +1 here, as I've recently had to use the violator pattern to flip those >> > bits. >> > -jason >> >> -- >> Alex Rudnick >> swe, gwt, atl >> >> >> > > > -- > "There are only 10 types of people in the world: Those who understand > binary, and those who don't" > > > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
