On Tue, Nov 11, 2008 at 10:38 AM, Isaac Truett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > We've been kicking around the idea of an "unsafe but fast" compile for > > exactly this reason. > > I always thought the compile was "unsafe" already. Hasn't the GWT > philosophy been to perform type safety/bounds/null checks only in > hosted mode, if at all? Are there many such checks currently left in > compiled code? I've even suggested adding more hosted mode-only checks > and been rejected because of the "cost" of such runtime validations. > It depends... we've definitely avoided doing certain checks in the JRE, but we do most of the language-level checks the JVM would do (with the notable exception of array bounds checking). But I definitely take your point to heart. --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
