Nah, fine by me. It certainly won't hurt anything. On Wed, Mar 11, 2009 at 7:06 PM, Ray Ryan <[email protected]> wrote:
> Exactly. Is that too subtle/sleazey? > > > On Wed, Mar 11, 2009 at 4:05 PM, <[email protected]> wrote: > >> >> http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/12803/diff/1/3 >> File user/src/com/google/gwt/user/datepicker/client/DateBox.java >> (right): >> >> http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/12803/diff/1/3#newcode244 >> Line 244: GWT.create(DefaultFormat.class); >> I assume the point of using GWT.create() here is to allow the bridge to >> instantiate it on behalf of the DateBox, right? >> >> >> http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/12803 >> > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
