On Thu, Mar 12, 2009 at 10:47 AM, Joel Webber <[email protected]> wrote:
> Wow. Just wow. It never ceases to amaze me how esoteric simple type > introspection can be in Javascript :) > Yes, we should patch this in, and perhaps as a side-effect encode this (and > other?) Javascript type tests into the core module somewhere. I'll create an > issue so we don't lose track, and take a stab at a patch momentarily. > I worry about relying on the toString output to tell what type it is -- what if a future browser/JS engine changes it slightly? Can we at least add a test to verify this so at least we will know if it blows up? -- John A. Tamplin Software Engineer (GWT), Google --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
