On Sat, Mar 7, 2009 at 11:46 AM, John Tamplin <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 7, 2009 at 3:26 AM, Sami Jaber <[email protected]> wrote: > >> I was using OOPHM as a early adopter since the beginning and with the >> incompatibilities between OOPHM and the new war directory layout, there is >> no way to provide you for feedback and I have lost in term of productivity >> (compile time is still so slow in 1.6) >> > > As we get closer to the next release, we will get OOPHM running with > HostedMode (and therefore war) and make it the sole way of running hosted > mode. However, there are a number of UI improvements that need to be made > before we can do away with legacy hosted mode (plus some other issues like > the testing story on Windows/Mac - in Linux we can run a Selenium-RC server > inside Xvfb, but there is no equivalent on Windows/Mac), and right now there > are competing priorities. Adding additional work to try and make it usable > with 1.6 seems counterproductive to actually getting it to its releasable > form. > >> BTW, OOPHM in trunk (as of earlier this week) supports HostedMode and the war format, and webAppCreator will produce a oophm target in the ant build file, so you can run it with just ant oophm. It does not yet create eclipse launch configs for OOPHM, but it shouldn't be hard to figure out -- basically just add gwt-dev-oophm.jar at the head of the classpath for your launch config. -- John A. Tamplin Software Engineer (GWT), Google --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
