On Tue, Mar 31, 2009 at 3:42 PM, Freeland Abbott <[email protected]> wrote: > I'm not sure I understand Ray's concern... JSO wouldn't implement iterable, > so another subclass of JSO would do whatever the author made it do. Most of > the methods on JsArray<T> and e.g. JsArrayString[1] are final, but we > wouldn't have to do that for iterator(), so a subclass could still override.
I assumed Ray's concern is based around the fact that only one subclass of JSO can implement any given interface so, if JsArray<T> implements Iterable<T>, no other subclass of JSO can implement it. Am I right? Ian --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
