Oh & I missed the open issue.  Please mark 3582 a duplicate.

On Mon, Apr 20, 2009 at 12:18 PM, Vitali Lovich <[email protected]> wrote:

> gwt-code-reviews
>
>
> On Mon, Apr 20, 2009 at 12:04 PM, Ray Ryan <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> Joel, you created an issue for this last month:
>> http://code.google.com/p/google-web-toolkit/issues/detail?id=3441
>>
>> Vitali, was the 500 you mentioned from the issue tracker or from
>> gwt-code-reviews?
>>
>> rjrjr
>>
>>
>> On Mon, Apr 20, 2009 at 8:36 AM, Vitali Lovich <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>> I signed the CLA.  Should be OK for now since I haven't started my job
>>> yet.
>>>
>>> I'm getting a HTTP SERVER 500 error creating the issue.  I've tried both
>>> upload.py & the web interface.
>>>
>>>
>>> On Mon, Apr 20, 2009 at 10:58 AM, Joel Webber <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Vitali,
>>>> Thanks for taking this on. I've been meaning to do it for ages, but
>>>> haven't had time. I haven't had a chance to look over the patch in detail
>>>> yet, but the general approach sounds good.
>>>>
>>>> To answer your earlier question about DOMImplMozilla[Old], the "old" one
>>>> (not the best name, I know) maps to the user-agent "gecko", which is the
>>>> fallback for pre-gecko-1.8. Gecko 1.8 is basically Firefox 1.5 and 2.0, and
>>>> is also used to support later versions (e.g., Firefox 3 is Gecko 1.9). 
>>>> Older
>>>> versions of Gecko don't exist in any browser you're likely to encounter in
>>>> the wild, but is used by the hosted-mode browser on Linux. As soon as we
>>>> move to out-of-process hosted mode (GWT 2.0 in all likelihood), we'll be
>>>> able to ditch support for old Geckos (yay!).
>>>>
>>>> A couple of procedural things:
>>>> - Have you had a chance to sign a CLA yet? It's just a minor procedural
>>>> thing, but necessary.
>>>>   (http://code.google.com/webtoolkit/makinggwtbetter.html#committers)
>>>> - Could I get you to create an issue to track this?
>>>> - Also, if you could upload this patch to
>>>> http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/ it would make it easier for
>>>> everyone to view and discuss.
>>>>   (Make sure to add [email protected] to
>>>> the CC list)
>>>>
>>>> Thanks again,
>>>> joel.
>>>>
>>>> On Sun, Apr 19, 2009 at 6:11 AM, Vitali Lovich <[email protected]>wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Oops - missed some compile errors in the JSNI code.  This is meant to
>>>>> be applied over top of the previous patches.  I've verified that if
>>>>> getElementsByClassName is not used then no code related to it appears in 
>>>>> the
>>>>> output (compiled the GWT samples & grepped for getElementsByClassName).
>>>>>
>>>>> I still need to test whether or not the implementations work & write
>>>>> unit tests.
>>>>>
>>>>> Just for easy reference for myself, [].slice.call(nodeList, 0); is the
>>>>> code to convert a nodelist into an array.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On Sun, Apr 19, 2009 at 5:47 AM, Vitali Lovich <[email protected]>wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Here's my second attempt at the patch (2 of 2 is just a documentation
>>>>>> adjustment).
>>>>>>
>>>>>> One caveat I forgot to mention is that there is slightly different
>>>>>> cross-platform behaviour right now.  The native implementations return
>>>>>> NodeLists which are live whereas the Javascript implementations simply
>>>>>> return arrays.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The question is should I change it so that a JsArray is always
>>>>>> returned (i.e. copy the node list into an array) so that semantics are
>>>>>> constant across browsers or leave as is for performance with maybe a 
>>>>>> caveat
>>>>>> that the user should be careful when using with FF3, Safari 3.1 or Opera 
>>>>>> 9.5
>>>>>> & copy into an array if they need array semantics?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Changes from first patch:
>>>>>> getElementsByClassName should now display the HTML5 behaviour in
>>>>>> quirks mode if the browser supports the native implementation or doesn't
>>>>>> provide XPath (IE or really really old versions of FF, Safari & friends).
>>>>>> I'm not sure how to get case insensitive string matching with XPath (so
>>>>>> quirks mode won't work according to the HTML5 spec in FF2, Safari 3, 
>>>>>> Opera
>>>>>> 9.4 or earlier).  Is it even possible to do, or should I just fall back 
>>>>>> to
>>>>>> using the DOM implementation in quirks mode & make a note that 
>>>>>> performance
>>>>>> could be improved drastically if quirks mode is turned off on browsers 
>>>>>> that
>>>>>> support XPath?  Or just leave as is - it'll certainly have the same
>>>>>> behaviour as all the other JS libraries out there.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Only DOMImpl, DOMImplStandard, & DOMImplSafari now require code
>>>>>> changes.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> DOMImpl: contains a native implementation using DOM.  By default this
>>>>>> gets called.
>>>>>> DOMImplStandard now defines getElementsByXPath.  The fastest approach
>>>>>> is assigned* to getElementsByClassName in the Element prototype & 
>>>>>> document.
>>>>>> overrides getElementsByClassName
>>>>>> DOMImplSafari: getElementsByXPath calls the native one supplied by
>>>>>> Safari.  I'm assuming that document._getElementsByXPath & 
>>>>>> document.evaluate
>>>>>> came in with the same version of Safari (the one that implemented
>>>>>> XPath).  If that's not the case, then I'll have to rework the code a bit.
>>>>>> Document: added isBackCompat().  Could use !isCSS1Compat() for now,
>>>>>> but this ensures no code change required if other compat modes are added 
>>>>>> in
>>>>>> the future ('cause !quirks is all we care about).
>>>>>>
>>>>>> *I'm assuming that the way I wrote it ensures that if the developer
>>>>>> doesn't use getElementsByClassName, then there's 0-cost: the function is
>>>>>> never registered because the GWT compiler will recognize the dead code.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> If it is used, then there's only the overhead of performing the
>>>>>> implementation selection once on startup.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Thank you,
>>>>>> Vitali
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On 4/18/09, Vitali Lovich <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>> > Also, what's the difference between DOMImplMozilla &
>>>>>> DOMImplMozillaOld
>>>>>> >  in terms of Firefox versions?
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> >  And what versions of each browser are supported?  Are all versions
>>>>>> of
>>>>>> >  Safari, FF, & Opera supported as much as possible?  Is there a
>>>>>> minimum
>>>>>> >  version for any of them?
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> >  On Sat, Apr 18, 2009 at 4:05 AM, Vitali Lovich <[email protected]>
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>> >  > If I put the check in a static block, then the check is only done
>>>>>> once
>>>>>> >  > on startup, right?  Is this acceptable, or is it frowned upon
>>>>>> because
>>>>>> >  > it adds a slight penalty to the startup even if the developer
>>>>>> never
>>>>>> >  > uses the function.
>>>>>> >  >
>>>>>> >  > Something like,
>>>>>> >  >
>>>>>> >  > static {
>>>>>> >  >  ensureGetElementsByClassNameRegistered();
>>>>>> >  > }
>>>>>> >  >
>>>>>> >  > private static native void
>>>>>> ensureGetElementsByClassNameRegistered() {
>>>>>> >  >   if (!document.getElementsByClassName) {
>>>>>> >  >      document.getElementsByClassName = function(element, class) {
>>>>>> >  >             // etc
>>>>>> >  >      }
>>>>>> >  >   }
>>>>>> >  > }
>>>>>> >  >
>>>>>> >  > On Sat, Apr 18, 2009 at 3:54 AM, Ray Cromwell <
>>>>>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>> >  >>
>>>>>> >  >> You don't want to create a separate property just for native
>>>>>> >  >> getElementsByClassName() as that would almost double the number
>>>>>> of
>>>>>> >  >> permutations (except IE where is it known not to exist)  What
>>>>>> you
>>>>>> >  >> could provide is 3 implementations. IE gets raw DOM version,
>>>>>> >  >> Safari/Firefox/Opera get a version that checks
>>>>>> >  >> if(document.getElementsByClassName) exists, and if not, falls
>>>>>> back to
>>>>>> >  >> document.evaluate.
>>>>>> >  >>
>>>>>> >  >> -Ray
>>>>>> >  >>
>>>>>> >  >>
>>>>>> >  >> On Fri, Apr 17, 2009 at 11:03 PM, Vitali Lovich <
>>>>>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>> >  >>>
>>>>>> >  >>> Do you have any suggestions regarding how to do the proper
>>>>>> deferred
>>>>>> >  >>> binding for the various versions?  Should I just put the
>>>>>> typical JS
>>>>>> >  >>> check that regular libraries use? (i.e. if
>>>>>> >  >>> (!document.getElementsByClassName) { // provide fallback }.  I
>>>>>> thought
>>>>>> >  >>> the whole point of deferred binding was to get around that.
>>>>>> >  >>>
>>>>>> >  >>> What is the list of officially supported browsers?  In
>>>>>> particular the
>>>>>> >  >>> specific minimum version for each?
>>>>>> >  >>>
>>>>>> >  >>> I guess I'm going to have to install a virtual machine for this
>>>>>> >  >>> because Safari refuses to work in wine 1.0.19 - chrome is
>>>>>> useable
>>>>>> >  >>> although no HTTPS sites.
>>>>>> >  >>>
>>>>>> >  >>> Is there a guide somewhere on writing & integrating the tests
>>>>>> into
>>>>>> >  >>> GWT, or just look at existing ones in the source.
>>>>>> >  >>>
>>>>>> >  >>> On Sat, Apr 18, 2009 at 1:49 AM, Miroslav Pokorny
>>>>>> >  >>> <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>> >  >>>>
>>>>>> >  >>>> Provide some tests and make sure it works on all officially
>>>>>> supported
>>>>>> >  >>>> browsers even if the implementation is suboptimal. There are
>>>>>> many js
>>>>>> >  >>>> libs out there so it's not hard to find the best way to do it
>>>>>> fir the
>>>>>> >  >>>> various browsers...
>>>>>> >  >>>>
>>>>>> >  >>>> On 18/04/2009, at 12:39 PM, Vitali Lovich <[email protected]>
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>> >  >>>>
>>>>>> >  >>>>> Just my first attempt at adding some initial support for
>>>>>> >  >>>>> getElementsByClassName.  This is by no means tested or
>>>>>> >  >>>>>
>>>>>> >  >>>>> Newer browsers support getElementsByClassName.  This is my
>>>>>> attempt
>>>>>> >  >>>>> at a patch.
>>>>>> >  >>>>>
>>>>>> >  >>>>> Caveats:
>>>>>> >  >>>>> There's a "bug" in that quirks mode doesn't behave properly
>>>>>> (I don't
>>>>>> >  >>>>> know how to detect it in the deferred binding) for IE &
>>>>>> Firefox2 &
>>>>>> >  >>>>> earlier.  According to the HTML5 spec, it's supposed to be
>>>>>> case
>>>>>> >  >>>>> insensitive in quirks mode.  However, this "bug" behaves the
>>>>>> exact
>>>>>> >  >>>>> same way as all the javascript wrappers do (since I based the
>>>>>> XPath &
>>>>>> >  >>>>> RegExp code paths roughly around the implementations floating
>>>>>> out
>>>>>> >  >>>>> there).
>>>>>> >  >>>>>
>>>>>> >  >>>>> I'm also not sure if I added the support correctly for
>>>>>> Firefox.
>>>>>> >  >>>>> getElementsByClassName only came in with FF3 & requires the
>>>>>> xpath
>>>>>> >  >>>>> workaround for FF2 & earlier (I believe I read xpath was
>>>>>> introduced
>>>>>> >  >>>>> with FF 1.5).  I placed the xpath code in DOMImplMozillaOld
>>>>>> for now
>>>>>> >  >>>>> (not sure whether or not gecko1_8 represents FF2).
>>>>>> >  >>>>>
>>>>>> >  >>>>> There's also no mention of the versions of Safari & Opera
>>>>>> that are
>>>>>> >  >>>>> supported by GWT, so they're defaulting to using the native
>>>>>> version
>>>>>> >  >>>>> (which will not work if they don't provide it).
>>>>>> >  >>>>>
>>>>>> >  >>>>> Safari in particular got it with version 3.1.  if earlier
>>>>>> versions are
>>>>>> >  >>>>> supported, it's not too much work.  Simply grab the
>>>>>> expression built
>>>>>> >  >>>>> in the FF xpath  & pass it to
>>>>>> document._getElementsByXPath(query,
>>>>>> >  >>>>> parent) for Safari versions that have xpath (not sure which
>>>>>> those
>>>>>> >  >>>>> are).  Not sure how to distinguish Safari pre3.1 & post3.1 in
>>>>>> deferred
>>>>>> >  >>>>> binding.
>>>>>> >  >>>>>
>>>>>> >  >>>>> Opera got it with 9.5.  Not sure when xPath support got into
>>>>>> Opera
>>>>>> >  >>>>> (should be a straightfoward copy of the mozilla code).  Not
>>>>>> sure how
>>>>>> >  >>>>> to distinguish the two in the deferred binding.
>>>>>> >  >>>>>
>>>>>> >  >>>>> Feedback would be appreciated.
>>>>>> >  >>>>>
>>>>>> >  >>>>> Should this go as an enhancement request in the issue
>>>>>> tracker?
>>>>>> >  >>>>>
>>>>>> >  >>>>> >
>>>>>> >  >>>>> diff --git a/user/src/com/google/gwt/dom/client/DOMImpl.java
>>>>>> b/user/
>>>>>> >  >>>>> src/com/google/gwt/dom/client/DOMImpl.java index
>>>>>> 1d7e39b..581764b
>>>>>> >  >>>>> 100644 --- a/user/src/com/google/gwt/dom/client/DOMImpl.java
>>>>>> +++ b/
>>>>>> >  >>>>> user/src/com/google/gwt/dom/client/DOMImpl.java @@ -176,6
>>>>>> +176,8 @@
>>>>>> >  >>>>> abstract class DOMImpl { return 0; }-*/; + public abstract
>>>>>> NodeList
>>>>>> >  >>>>> getElementsByClassName(Element parent, String className); +
>>>>>> public
>>>>>> >  >>>>> native Element getFirstChildElement(Element elem) /*-{ var
>>>>>> child =
>>>>>> >  >>>>> elem.firstChild; while (child && child.nodeType != 1) diff
>>>>>> --git a/
>>>>>> >  >>>>> user/src/com/google/gwt/dom/client/DOMImplIE6.java
>>>>>> b/user/src/com/
>>>>>> >  >>>>> google/gwt/dom/client/DOMImplIE6.java index 04c205a..8c24a6c
>>>>>> 100644
>>>>>> >  >>>>> --- a/user/src/com/google/gwt/dom/client/DOMImplIE6.java +++
>>>>>> b/user/
>>>>>> >  >>>>> src/com/google/gwt/dom/client/DOMImplIE6.java @@ -15,6 +15,8
>>>>>> @@ */
>>>>>> >  >>>>> package com.google.gwt.dom.client; +import
>>>>>> >  >>>>> com.google.gwt.core.client.JsArray; +  /** * Internet
>>>>>> Explorer 6
>>>>>> >  >>>>> implementation of * {...@link
>>>>>> com.google.gwt.user.client.impl.DOMImpl}.
>>>>>> >  >>>>> @@ -184,6 +186,31 @@ class DOMImplIE6 extends DOMImpl { }
>>>>>> @Override
>>>>>> >  >>>>> + public NodeList getElementsByClassName(Element parent,
>>>>>> String
>>>>>> >  >>>>> className) { + // TODO: detect quirks mode so that the
>>>>>> regexps do a
>>>>>> >  >>>>> case insensitive match as per the + // spec. when quirks mode
>>>>>> >  >>>>> detected, pass "i" as the flags parameter + return
>>>>>> >  >>>>> getElementsByClassName(parent, className.split(" "),
>>>>>> "").cast(); + }
>>>>>> >  >>>>> + +  private native JsArray getElementsByClassName(Element
>>>>>> parent,
>>>>>> >  >>>>> String [] classes, String flags) /*-{ + var i, j, e, c,
>>>>>> elements =
>>>>>> >  >>>>> parent.all || parent.getElementsByTagName("*"); + var regexps
>>>>>> = [],
>>>>>> >  >>>>> result = []; + for (i = classes.length - 1; i >= 0; i--) { +
>>>>>> c =
>>>>>> >  >>>>> classes[i].replace(/^\s+|\s+$/g, ""); + if (c.length) +
>>>>>> >  >>>>> regexps.push(new RegExp(new Array("(?:^|\\s)", c, "(?:\\s|
>>>>>> >  >>>>> $)").join(""), flags); + } + if (regexps.length) { + for (i =
>>>>>> 0, c =
>>>>>> >  >>>>> elements.length; i < c; i++) { + e = elements[i]; + for (j =
>>>>>> >  >>>>> regexps.length - 1; j >= 0 && regexps[j].test(e); j--) {} + j
>>>>>> == -1
>>>>>> >  >>>>> && result.push(e); + } + } + return result; + }-*/; + +
>>>>>> @Override
>>>>>> >  >>>>> public native String getInnerText(Element elem) /*-{ return
>>>>>> >  >>>>> elem.innerText; }-*/; diff --git
>>>>>> a/user/src/com/google/gwt/dom/
>>>>>> >  >>>>> client/DOMImplMozillaOld.java
>>>>>> b/user/src/com/google/gwt/dom/client/
>>>>>> >  >>>>> DOMImplMozillaOld.java index ecf52fb..5fd7312 100644 ---
>>>>>> a/user/src/
>>>>>> >  >>>>> com/google/gwt/dom/client/DOMImplMozillaOld.java +++
>>>>>> b/user/src/com/
>>>>>> >  >>>>> google/gwt/dom/client/DOMImplMozillaOld.java @@ -15,6 +15,8
>>>>>> @@ */
>>>>>> >  >>>>> package com.google.gwt.dom.client; +import
>>>>>> >  >>>>> com.google.gwt.core.client.JsArray; +  /** * DOM
>>>>>> implementation
>>>>>> >  >>>>> differences for older version of Mozilla (mostly the * hosted
>>>>>> mode
>>>>>> >  >>>>> browser on linux). The main difference is due to changes in
>>>>>> @@
>>>>>> >  >>>>> -114,4 +116,23 @@ package com.google.gwt.dom.client; return
>>>>>> top +
>>>>>> >  >>>>> viewport.scrollTop; }-*/; + + @Override + public NodeList
>>>>>> >  >>>>> getElementsByClassName(Element parent, String className) { +
>>>>>> // the
>>>>>> >  >>>>> cast should be safe since both it & JsArray access the
>>>>>> underlying
>>>>>> >  >>>>> object the same way + // and NodeList is immutable
>>>>>> (constraints
>>>>>> >  >>>>> added, not removed) + return getElementsByClassName(parent,
>>>>>> >  >>>>> className.split(" ")).cast(); + } + + private native JsArray
>>>>>> >  >>>>> getElementsByClassName(Element parent, String [] classes)
>>>>>> /*-{ + var
>>>>>> >  >>>>> result, i, xpathResult, classExpr = ".//*"; + for (i =
>>>>>> >  >>>>> classes.length - 1; i >= 0; i--) { + classExpr +=
>>>>>> >  >>>>> "[contains(concat(' ', @class, ' '), ' " + classes[i] + "
>>>>>> ')]"; + }
>>>>>> >  >>>>> + xpathResult = document.evaluate(classExpr, parent, null, 0,
>>>>>> null);
>>>>>> >  >>>>> + while ((i = xpathResult.iterateNext())) { + result.push(i);
>>>>>> + } +
>>>>>> >  >>>>> return result; + }-*/; } diff --git
>>>>>> a/user/src/com/google/gwt/dom/
>>>>>> >  >>>>> client/DOMImplStandard.java
>>>>>> b/user/src/com/google/gwt/dom/client/
>>>>>> >  >>>>> DOMImplStandard.java index 90d2e89..be29fe1 100644 ---
>>>>>> a/user/src/
>>>>>> >  >>>>> com/google/gwt/dom/client/DOMImplStandard.java +++
>>>>>> b/user/src/com/
>>>>>> >  >>>>> google/gwt/dom/client/DOMImplStandard.java @@ -114,6 +114,11
>>>>>> @@
>>>>>> >  >>>>> abstract class DOMImplStandard extends DOMImpl { }-*/;
>>>>>> @Override +
>>>>>> >  >>>>> public native NodeList getElementsByClassName(Element parent,
>>>>>> String
>>>>>> >  >>>>> className) /*-{ + return
>>>>>> parent.getElementsByClassName(className);
>>>>>> >  >>>>> + }-*/; + + @Override public native boolean
>>>>>> isOrHasChild(Element
>>>>>> >  >>>>> parent, Element child) /*-{ return parent.contains(child);
>>>>>> }-*/;
>>>>>> >  >>>>> diff --git a/user/src/com/google/gwt/dom/client/Document.java
>>>>>> b/user/
>>>>>> >  >>>>> src/com/google/gwt/dom/client/Document.java index
>>>>>> 209b1b9..23d6daf
>>>>>> >  >>>>> 100644 --- a/user/src/com/google/gwt/dom/client/Document.java
>>>>>> +++ b/
>>>>>> >  >>>>> user/src/com/google/gwt/dom/client/Document.java @@ -1125,6
>>>>>> +1125,18
>>>>>> >  >>>>> @@ public class Document extends Node { }-*/; /** + * Returns
>>>>>> a
>>>>>> >  >>>>> {...@link NodeList} of all the {...@link Element Elements} with 
>>>>>> > a
>>>>>> given +
>>>>>> >  >>>>> * class name in the order in which they are encountered in a
>>>>>> >  >>>>> preorder traversal + * of the document tree. + * + * @param
>>>>>> >  >>>>> className the space-separated name of the classes to match on
>>>>>> + *
>>>>>> >  >>>>> @return a list containing all the matched elements. + */ +
>>>>>> public
>>>>>> >  >>>>> final NodeList getElementsByClassName(String className) { +
>>>>>> return
>>>>>> >  >>>>> DOMImpl.impl.getElementsByClassName(this.cast(), className);
>>>>>> + } +
>>>>>> >  >>>>> + /** * Returns the {...@link Element} whose id is given by
>>>>>> elementId.
>>>>>> >  >>>>> If no such * element exists, returns null. Behavior is not
>>>>>> defined
>>>>>> >  >>>>> if more than one * element has this id. diff --git
>>>>>> a/user/src/com/
>>>>>> >  >>>>> google/gwt/dom/client/Element.java
>>>>>> b/user/src/com/google/gwt/dom/
>>>>>> >  >>>>> client/Element.java index a0bf9f2..d64b83e 100644 ---
>>>>>> a/user/src/com/
>>>>>> >  >>>>> google/gwt/dom/client/Element.java +++
>>>>>> b/user/src/com/google/gwt/dom/
>>>>>> >  >>>>> client/Element.java @@ -149,6 +149,18 @@ public class Element
>>>>>> >  >>>>> extends Node { }-*/; /** + * Returns a {...@link NodeList} of
>>>>>> all the
>>>>>> >  >>>>> {...@link Element Elements} with a given + * class name in the
>>>>>> order in
>>>>>> >  >>>>> which they are encountered in a preorder traversal + * of
>>>>>> this
>>>>>> >  >>>>> elements children. + * + * @param className the
>>>>>> space-separated
>>>>>> >  >>>>> names of the classes to match on + * @return a list
>>>>>> containing all
>>>>>> >  >>>>> the matched elements. + */ + public final NodeList
>>>>>> >  >>>>> getElementsByClassName(String className) { + return
>>>>>> >  >>>>> DOMImpl.impl.getElementsByClassName(this, className); + } + +
>>>>>> /** *
>>>>>> >  >>>>> Returns a NodeList of all descendant Elements with a given
>>>>>> tag name,
>>>>>> >  >>>>> in the * order in which they are encountered in a preorder
>>>>>> traversal
>>>>>> >  >>>>> of this Element * tree.
>>>>>> >  >>>>
>>>>>> >  >>>> >
>>>>>> >  >>>>
>>>>>> >  >>>
>>>>>> >  >>> >
>>>>>> >  >>>
>>>>>> >  >>
>>>>>> >  >> >  >>
>>>>>> >  >>
>>>>>> >  >
>>>>>> >
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>> >>
>>
>

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to