Yes, this is the best forum to talk about incubator widgets. Its always helpful to add the author of the widget to the to field of the email as well, if you know who the author is.
Thanks, John LaBanca [email protected] On Fri, May 1, 2009 at 10:53 AM, jay <[email protected]> wrote: > > Is this the best forum for providing feedback on these widgets? (I've > looked high & low, and found nothing better, but it's entirely > possible I've managed to miss the obvious ;-) > > thanks! > > jay > > On May 1, 7:03 am, Bruce Johnson <[email protected]> wrote: > > We do expect to start moving a cluster of the most popular widgets from > the > > incubator into the GWT trunk this quarter, so things like the paging > table, > > etc. will almost certainly be in the next GWT major release. > > > > > > > > On Fri, May 1, 2009 at 1:53 AM, Gilles B <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > > > I am currently using gen2 tables. It's realy a good stuff and this > > > part realy miss in GWT widgets with paging (or not), columns sort and > > > such cool mechanisms. > > > > > I have tried other tables implementations but this one is not so big > > > and work fine for me. As example, Smart GWT offers a realy good and > > > more beautifull component but I doesn't want to include such full > > > framework implying some js library extra dependance (half commercial). > > > The gwt as a toolkit approach seems better and its avoid the big > > > library syndrom (Including hundred of script, css, resources, javacode > > > in your app if you only want a single component) > > > > > As 1.6 only provide an additionnal calendar I was a little bit > > > disappointed expected more widgets in this version. Is there a plan to > > > add such widgets in future releases or is it a choice to provide a > > > basic set and opening the field to third party libraries ? > > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
