Sorry, lemme clarify. I mean that maybe, just maybe, there's a correct formulation of the library code such that some work can be optimized out when the return value is not used.
On Fri, Jun 5, 2009 at 1:50 PM, John Tamplin <[email protected]> wrote: > On Fri, Jun 5, 2009 at 1:21 PM, Scott Blum <[email protected]> wrote: > >> This would definitely be a good thing to look into, but I expect it's >> slightly tricky. Maybe the library code itself could be hacked on until a >> suitable formulation was found. > > > Since the JRE requires returning the values (a very bad idea IMHO) then I > don't see how we can short circuit it in the library. > > -- > John A. Tamplin > Software Engineer (GWT), Google > > > > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
