> Of course, if we ran the GWT compiler as a service on the developer's > desktop (or kept it hot from the Eclipse plugin), then we could run it with > -server and win it back over many compiles... hmmm. :)
Would keeping that VM alive open up the possibility of a semi-incremental build? On Fri, Jun 5, 2009 at 1:52 PM, Scott Blum <[email protected]> wrote: > On Fri, Jun 5, 2009 at 1:47 PM, Lex Spoon <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> Reading further in the thread, though, maybe we should simply use -server! > > Funny enough, I used to use -server in all my launch configs, but at some > point I found it seemed actually a lot slower most of the time, due to all > the overhead. I think you need a really big compile to make it worth it > (30-perm Showcase might be worth it, the other samples probably not). > Of course, if we ran the GWT compiler as a service on the developer's > desktop (or kept it hot from the Eclipse plugin), then we could run it with > -server and win it back over many compiles... hmmm. :) > > > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
