Transparent support for CSS3/HTML5 on all browsers including IE would be a
killer feature !+1

2009/7/1 tfreitas <[email protected]>

>
> +1
>
> On Jun 29, 10:24 am, dflorey <[email protected]> wrote:
> > Hi,
> > I've been wondering how GWT should deal with upcoming new features in
> > HTML5/CSS3.
> > There are several areas where functionality that has been implemented
> > in GWT is now also available in the upcoming rendering engines.
> >
> > GWT is creating highly optimized JavaScript and the JavaScript-engines
> > are getting better and better... but: My guess is that for example
> > animations will be smoother when using CSS3 animations instead of
> > JavaScript based animations.
> > Same about rounded corners/shadows and stuff alike. In GWT you'll
> > typically use DecoratedPanel to implement rounded corners with
> > shadows. But Firefox3.5 and the latest Safari and Chrome releases also
> > support css-based rounded borders and shadows.
> >
> > So my proposal would be to use deferred binding to "emulate" these
> > features on browsers that do not support the latest features (IE8...)
> > and to use a lightweight css based impl on WebKit/Firefox 3.5.
> >
> > In my example of DecoratedPanel the 9x9 approach should be kept for IE
> > and a null impl with css based rounded corners should be available for
> > Firefox (css have to match the given theme).
> > Animations that come with the standard widgets should also be able to
> > fallback to css based animations when available.
> >
> > I've been also reading some posts about the new datagrid html
> > extension and thought it might be clever to have a look at the spec
> > when moving the tables from incubator to trunk to see how far the
> > concepts match. Would be very cool to have a native table
> > implementation on WebKit browsers while other fallback to gwt impls.
> >
> > What do you think?
> >
>

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to