2009/8/4 Rob Heittman <[email protected]> > > I bet you were into the lovely EJB artifacts too? Ha ha this is strangely >> reminiscent. >> > > No, I wasn't. Really, I don't see the correlation. >
Boiler plate, _almost_ duplicate interfaces anyone? "Business methods defined in the remote interface must be duplicated in the bean class" > My feeling as a GWT developer is that overall GWT has been moving, from 1.6 > thru 2.0 trunk, to a position of being less confusing and more deterministic > and predictable. I like this. > Very true. If I had time I would love to hack the gwt compiler to see what kind of problems might occur if it generated continuation style js. > I think, boiled down, my feeling is that the impedance mismatch between > XmlHttpRequest and RPC continuations is just too steep to ever really > abstract away successfully, so I worry that any effort in that direction > would be bootless. Mind, I would probably have said that several years ago > about Java-to-JS compilation in general, so if anyone can prove my belief > wrong, it's this gang here. > Yes I agree that the guys behind GWT change the way you think about client side web dev which makes anything seem possible. Maybe even the impossible. Cheers, John --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
