Thanks, Lex. I didn't try the &#x; idea (see Ian's comment), but I also added the other illegal characters. I'll leave the recoverability (in the dashboard) for another day: (x00) and (uffff) seem good to me for human consumption, and the "surrogate blocks" characters shouldn't really ever in an application.
On 2009/08/19 13:28:10, Lex wrote: > I like the &#x; idea. There is just one potential problem: will XML readers > support it? The linked XML spec has the same restrictions on encoded character > entities as on raw characters appearing in the file. Does anyone know if that > restriction is honored in practice? Anyone want to test on Xerces? http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/61801 --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
