Also, is there a reason we can't discard junit.headless from common.ant.xml, rather than hardcoding it true?
On Thu, Sep 24, 2009 at 3:53 PM, <[email protected]> wrote: > LGTM > > Reitveld is again acting up -- I couldn't actually view any of the files > but the first and last, but I could get a diff of the whole patch to > look at. > > > http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/71804/diff/1/2 > File common.ant.xml (right): > > http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/71804/diff/1/2#newcode185 > Line 185: <jvmarg line="-Xmx2048m" /> > I don't know that we want to increase this in the build file. > > http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/71804/diff/1/7 > File user/build.xml (right): > > http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/71804/diff/1/7#newcode145 > Line 145: <gwt.junit test.args="${test.args}" > test.out="${junit.out}/${build.host.platform}-hosted-mode" > test.cases="test.hosted.tests" > > I assume this is temporary? > > > http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/71804 > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
