Love the enthusiasm! Anyone else? On Mon, Oct 19, 2009 at 4:26 PM, Sami Jaber <[email protected]> wrote:
> IMHO, It would be a mistake not to make it happen for GWT 2 > > deRPC is a huge step forward in terms of performance, extensibility, > command sinking, serialization extensibility, security and so forth > Everybody know that GWT 2 will introduce new API and many new > functionalities, why deRPC would not be part of the show? > Because it has not been intensively tested ? There's probably a lack of > tests cases, sure, but it is not specific to deRPC. When I see the last > commit streams, deRPC seems to me more reliable than other APIs. And > regarding the migration path and the different use case scenarios, this is > sweet. If you want to stay in legacy land, just use the straight > RemoteServiceServlet class. If you want to support the two modes, just > inherits from HybridServiceServlet (as JUnitHostImpl does in the trunk right > now). If you are a newcomer, forget all the old non-extensible interfaces > and use RpcServlet and RpcService. > > Releasing deRPC does not mean that you won't be able to patch if later. > Earlier it will be released, earlier you will get feedback. Please think > about it. > > My 2 french euros, > > Sami > > > > On Mon, Oct 19, 2009 at 9:49 PM, Bruce Johnson <[email protected]> wrote: > >> So, here's the deal on deRPC. It doesn't yet have the miles on it that >> we'd like, so we're pretty much on the fence as to whether to really ship it >> in GWT 2.0 or not. >> It has been included in MS1 and will be in MS2, but we may still make a >> "no go" decision before the GWT 2.0 RC comes out. >> >> If you (as in, anyone reading this email) have tried the new RPC stuff and >> have feedback, now would be the right time to give it a thumbs up or thumbs >> down. At the moment, we're leaning thumbs down -- mainly to be conservative. >> >> -- Bruce >> >> On Mon, Oct 19, 2009 at 3:45 PM, Sami Jaber <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> Following a question I asked privately to Bruce and Amit. >>> Thanks for your response gwitters >>> >>> Sami >>> >>> On Mon, Oct 19, 2009 at 9:38 PM, Bruce Johnson <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>>> Sami, would you mind asking this question directly on the Contributors >>>> list? We can answer it so that everyone has a chance to comment. >>>> Thanks. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>>>> On Sat, Oct 17, 2009 at 1:46 AM, Sami Jaber <[email protected]>wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> Bruce, >>>>>>> >>>>>>> What is the status of deRPC API in GWT 2. The code is in the trunk, >>>>>>> it seems to be work very well (at least with my test cases) but nothing >>>>>>> in >>>>>>> GWT MS1 Amit announce and very few gwtc posts regarding the API/issue. >>>>>>> Are you planning to ship deRPC with GWT 2 (I would love to regarding >>>>>>> all the JDO/AppEngine integration) ? Similarly, are you planning to >>>>>>> update >>>>>>> GPE to conform to the new interfaces, RpcService, RpcServlet, etc ... ( >>>>>>> http://code.google.com/eclipse/docs/gwt_rpc.html) ? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Thanks for you response, >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Sami >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>> >>> >> > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
