BTW: the main thing I wanted to ask was if this will impact your CCL code in any way. John T was nervous about me removing the call to isClassnameGenerated() when making the anonymous class determination.
http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/89817/diff/1/3 File dev/core/src/com/google/gwt/dev/javac/CompiledClass.java (right): http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/89817/diff/1/3#newcode80 Line 80: boolean anonymous = false; Can do. http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/89817/diff/1/3#newcode83 Line 83: anonymous = true; Not sure I under the question? I'm considering all local classes to be anonymous here, whether they are one directly, or are contained in one. Even a named local class cannot be accessed outside of its containing method. http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/89817/diff/1/3#newcode86 Line 86: binding = ((NestedTypeBinding) binding).enclosingType; > is this cast guaranteed to succeed? Should be, since all top-level types are considered static. Or to put it another way, when I was doing it with a type check, I was ultimately relying on an assertion in another branch of an if-else chain. John liked this formulation better. http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/89817 --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
