On 2009/11/09 14:34:54, t.broyer wrote: > Sorry to jump in without having been invited but, given > http://code.google.com/p/google-web-toolkit/issues/detail?id=805 (among others), > shouldn't the iframe shim be extended to all browsers instead?
> (Closure-library seems to be doing just this; or actually, it moves the > responsibility to the developer on a case-by-case basis: http://closure-library.googlecode.com/svn/trunk/closure/goog/docs/class_goog_ui_Dialog.html > ) [comments always welcome!] Issue 805 seems to be primarily about Flash. I haven't had time to look into this, but I thought you could add a parameter to the Flash object to fix this (one commenter suggests wmode='transparent', which seems to ring a bell. If this proves insufficient, I would be happy to revisit the problem. http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/97807 --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
