A revision number of 0 wasn't a requirement, I simply observed that other installers are using a 4-number version.
On Mon, Nov 30, 2009 at 1:33 PM, John Tamplin <[email protected]> wrote: > On Mon, Nov 30, 2009 at 1:30 PM, John LaBanca <[email protected]> wrote: > >> cramsdale/jat - >> >> Did one of you mention that the revision number of the IE installer has to >> be 0, or did I dream that up? >> > > I didn't say that -- I did say I thought Windows wanted 4-number versions, > and perhaps you added .0 from that. > > However, I don't think the docs need to say anything about the date > convention, as we won't continue that once we get to the final release. > > -- > John A. Tamplin > Software Engineer (GWT), Google > -- http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors
