To be clear, I don't know of any cases where people *can't* use iframes. There are some cases where teams have chosen to use <script> tags for an assumed performance benefit, but I don't know of anyone ever having measured it. Most of the time people use <script> tags for cross-site or late-loading behavior. If we could make iframes work for these cases, and show that there's no performance benefit to <script> tags, it may be less of an issue.
The iPhone only has problems rendering iframes (it essentially drops their content into the outer page as though it were inline), but that's about it. On Tue, Dec 1, 2009 at 11:44 AM, Lex Spoon <sp...@google.com> wrote: > Thanks for the test code and data, Matt! It sounds like enough > browsers are covered that error reporting is no longer a major decider > between XHR vs. script tags. > > Regarding iframes, be aware that some GWT users can't use them. I > don't know all the reasons why, but one example reason is that iframes > don't work reasonably on iPhones. So, we need to support non-iframe > linkers for at least some use cases. > > > Lex > -- http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors
