Thanks Matt, that does the trick.
Actually I'm just post processing a template host html page with an ant 
task before deployment, that solves the decoupling concern.

On 17.12.2009 21:06, Matt Mastracci wrote:
> If it's the same error we ran into, it's that there are things that look like 
> HTML script and comment tags in the linker script that throw the parser off. 
> Note how we broke up the script start tags and comment start/end tags the 
> same way as the script end tags:
>
> XSLinker:
>
>    var compiledScriptTag = '"<script src=\\"' + base + strongName + 
> '.cache.js\\"></scr" + "ipt>"';
>    $doc.write('<script><!--\n'
>      + 'window.__gwtStatsEvent&&  window.__gwtStatsEvent({'
>      + 'moduleName:"__MODULE_NAME__", sessionId:$sessionId, 
> subSystem:"startup",'
>      + 'evtGroup: "loadExternalRefs", millis:(new Date()).getTime(),'
>      + 'type: "end"});'
>      + 'window.__gwtStatsEvent&&  window.__gwtStatsEvent({'
>      + 'moduleName:"__MODULE_NAME__", sessionId:$sessionId, 
> subSystem:"startup",'
>      + 'evtGroup: "moduleStartup", millis:(new Date()).getTime(),'
>      + 'type: "moduleRequested"});'
>      + 'document.write(' + compiledScriptTag + ');'
>      + '\n--></script>');
>
> Our linker:
>
>    var compiledScriptTag = '"<scr'+'ipt src=\\"' + base + strongName + 
> '\\"></scr" + "ipt>"';
>    $doc.write('<scr'+'ipt><!-'+'-\n'
>      + 'window.__gwtStatsEvent&&  window.__gwtStatsEvent({'
>      + 'moduleName:"__MODULE_NAME__", subSystem:"startup",'
>      + 'evtGroup: "loadExternalRefs", millis:(new Date()).getTime(),'
>      + 'type: "end"});'
>      + 'window.__gwtStatsEvent&&  window.__gwtStatsEvent({'
>      + 'moduleName:"__MODULE_NAME__", subSystem:"startup",'
>      + 'evtGroup: "moduleStartup", millis:(new Date()).getTime(),'
>      + 'type: "moduleRequested"});'
>      + 'document.write(' + compiledScriptTag + ');'
>      + '\n-'+'-></scr'+'ipt>');
>
> We've had inlining working on dotspots.com in GWT trunk for a while now, but 
> I'm considering going back to an external nocache.js so we can more easily 
> decouple our static content from the GWT code.
>
> Matt.
>
> On 2009-12-17, at 12:40 PM, George Georgovassilis wrote:
>
>    
>> Some time ago we discussed [1] inlining nocache.js into the host page
>> to speed up initial page load, which I find quite worthwhile a read.
>> While back in the 1.7 days I managed to inline nochache.js with a
>> modest effort of post processing (escaping some javascript), 2.0
>> defeats me. I can't find a way to inline the GWT 2.0 compiler's
>> nocache.js into the host page without always running into some
>> javascript syntax error, which prohibits the entire code from loading.
>>
>> Any hints?
>>
>>
>> [1]
>> http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit-contributors/browse_thread/thread/8127c586073b1711/2eeb884f6f5cdcbf?lnk=gst&q=inline#2eeb884f6f5cdcbf
>>
>> -- 
>> http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors
>>      
>    

-- 
http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors

Reply via email to