Thanks for the feedback Brad.  We've talked internally about an idea for
"instant compile" where the workflow would be essentially like hosted mode,
except it would very quickly translate your code into JavaScript with zero
optimizations.  It sounds like there might be some interest in this.

(Of course, we also want to make hosted mode much faster than it is even in
2.0!)

On Fri, Dec 18, 2009 at 9:50 AM, Brad Leupen <[email protected]> wrote:

> Arthur,
>
> No, we are not closing DevMode. Our client app is not small.
> Refreshing DevMode in 2.0 takes 20-30 seconds on a decent multi-core
> workstation. Often, we are only able to refresh a handful of times
> before we start running into out-of-memory exceptions and browser
> crashes (FF 3.5.6). I don't want to sound unappreciative - DevMode in
> 2.0 is MUCH MUCH faster than before. We are very excited about this.
> However, I rarely need to use the debugger in the actual client. Most
> of the time I just want to refresh the layout or test the usability of
> a widget. For this, DevMode is overkill and, in fact, useless for
> testing real world UI latency.
>
> Draft Compile is a wonderful idea but even it takes over a minute to
> compile a single permutation of our app.
>
> At the end of the day, all i want to do is make a small change to a
> widget and refresh my browser to test the layout, look and feel, and
> usability. over and over and over. Sometimes i might need to debug my
> ui logic but not most of the time.
>
> Brad
>
> --
> http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors
>

-- 
http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors

Reply via email to