Seems like we need a bot to publish Waves as Google Code wikis :) -- Arthur Kalmenson
On Tue, Feb 2, 2010 at 11:47 AM, Ray Ryan <[email protected]> wrote: > Well, not nothing — it'd be pretty easy for a bot to be written to publish > static views of waves. But without that… > > On Tue, Feb 2, 2010 at 8:47 AM, Ray Ryan <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> That's a very good point. I'm confident we could get anyone invited who >> wants to participate, but there's nothing we could do yet to make such waves >> visible to non-members, and that would be really bad. >> >> On Tue, Feb 2, 2010 at 8:43 AM, Paul Robinson <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>> I'd hate to see even more discussions moving away from here (because I, >>> and maybe quite a few others here, don't have access to Wave). >>> >>> Paul >>> >>> Ray Ryan wrote: >>> > >>> > We can use the public Wave instance with alternate addresses. >>> > Inconvenient, but it's not that big a deal. >>> > >>> > <http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors> >>> >>> -- >>> http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors >> >> >> >> -- >> I wish this were a Wave > > > > -- > I wish this were a Wave > > -- > http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors -- http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors
