> Also, my coworkers and I are wondering if GWT is single.?

I am not an English native (so I might have read smth you didn't mean :)),
but this is very funny. I love her too.

Andi


On Tue, Mar 9, 2010 at 11:24 AM, Eric B. Ridge <[email protected]> wrote:

> Hi Ray.  Thanks for the pointer.  That was exactly what I needed.
> Took about 20 minutes of "work" to get InputStream and Reader working
> in GWT.
>
> Also, my coworkers and I are wondering if GWT is single.
>
> eric
>
> On Mar 8, 5:18 pm, Ray Cromwell <[email protected]> wrote:
> > Look at the user/super/com/google/gwt/emul source for the GWT JRE
> > emulation, e.g.
> http://code.google.com/p/google-web-toolkit/source/browse/trunk/user/...
> > <super-source/> is what you want. It allows Web mode and Hosted Mode
> > to see different source code.
> >
> > -Ray
> >
> > On Mon, Mar 8, 2010 at 12:54 PM, Eric B. Ridge <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> > > Please don't laugh (at least not out loud).
> >
> > > I've run into a situation where I really need to use a JavaCC
> > > generated parser on the client-side.  The generated code is all simple
> > > Java, except for its use of java.io.InputStream and java.io.Reader.
> >
> > > Is it possible to implement additional GWT JRE objects as maybe a GWT
> > > module, or through various .gwt.xml directives?  Basically, could
> > > support for those base classes be added without modifying the GWT
> > > source directly?
> >
> > > If yes, is there a starting documentation page somewhere on the
> > > intertubes?
> >
> > > ISTM that translating java.io.InputStream would be stupid simple, and
> > > then I could roll my own lame implementation that uses a
> > > java.lang.String as the backing store.  In my case, I just need to
> > > parse user-typed strings.  I've got no need to tie the InputStream to
> > > an HTTP response, for example.
> >
> > > java.io.Reader might be a bit more difficult since it references stuff
> > > in java.nio, but I could probably work around that (even if I have to
> > > manually/programmatically hack the JavaCC generated parser source at
> > > build time).
> >
> > > Anyways, any advice on where to begin implementing an additional GWT
> > > JRE object will be greatly appreciated.
> >
> > > eric
> >
> > > --
> > >http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors
>
> --
> http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors
>

-- 
http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors

Reply via email to