I think that's correct, but we historically have been pretty lazy about updating our dependencies...
On Fri, Apr 16, 2010 at 4:39 PM, Marko Vuksanovic <[email protected] > wrote: > One more question - why aren't JUnit 4 libraries used? I think junit4 > supports junit3 test style? Am I right? > > > On Fri, Apr 16, 2010 at 10:12 PM, Marko Vuksanovic < > [email protected]> wrote: > >> I like challenges :):) >> >> >> On Fri, Apr 16, 2010 at 10:09 PM, John Tamplin <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> On Fri, Apr 16, 2010 at 3:45 PM, Marko Vuksanovic < >>> [email protected]> wrote: >>> >>>> I just noticed that there is HasAnnotations interface... I might try >>>> putting that to use... >>>> >>>> On Apr 16, 9:38 pm, Marko Vuksanovic <[email protected]> >>>> wrote: >>>> > Well I've been looking at the existing code and I have seen that >>>> > JClassType implements getMethods(). Then I would be able to check if a >>>> > method has Annotation applied - using isAnnotationPresent() method. >>>> > >>>> > I am not sure how to check if a method has an annotation applied and >>>> > not to use the refelection package. The problem is that that package >>>> > cannot be used in translatable code. Obviously I'm missing something >>>> > here... >>>> >>> >>> You probably want to look at GWTRunnerGenerator, which generates the >>> implementation of GWTRunner to actually run it (and has access to >>> TypeOracle), or JUnitShell, which actually drives running the tests and can >>> use reflection to look at the annotations (though be careful about different >>> classloaders). >>> >>> That said, I suspect supporting JUnit4 is likely to be a lot of work. >>> >>> -- >>> John A. Tamplin >>> Software Engineer (GWT), Google >>> >>> -- >>> http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors >>> >> >> > -- > http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors > -- http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors
