Ray, Amit: could / should we use this and drop the json.org jars? Kelly tells me offline that these generate json that is more consistent with JSON.parse in the browser.
For that matter, would it be worth RequestFactory's while to get this lib to work both client and server side? rjrjr On Thu, Jul 15, 2010 at 4:55 PM, <[email protected]> wrote: > On 2010/07/15 20:49:43, zundel wrote: > >> These classes are intended for use in DevMode and Compiler for >> > creating > >> performance related data dump. Right now, it is a part of the >> > gwt-dev.jar, not > >> for use by GWT end developers. >> > > Then I suggest c.g.g.dev.json or similar. > > We don't really have a good place to put things that are shared between > server-side code and the compiler, although c.g.g.i18n.server.GwtLocale* > is used both on the server and in generators during compilation. > > > http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/696801/show > > -- > http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors > -- http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors
