Same for Abstract list, yeah, providing a default for showDetails is nice, making it private is not so much
On Tue, Aug 17, 2010 at 12:30 PM, Pascal Patry <i...@invalidip.com> wrote: > On Tuesday, August 17, 2010 11:50:13 Patrick Julien wrote: >> OK, I don't get how exit() being private works. If we think about the >> scenario where we have child resources to create after we get the >> "real" id from the server, how are we suppose to save those child >> resources? Not to mention that I don't really care for showing the >> "details" place in every case. >> >> There is a bug opened about this already: >> >> http://code.google.com/p/google-web-toolkit/issues/detail?id=5160 >> >> just added my star > > Yeah, a very annoying issue in AbstractRecordEditActivity. There is no way > this can be used in a real web application. > We definitely need to know when save has been completed. We also have LIST > operations going directly to EDIT... I don't > see how we update to this revision of GWT. "exit()" would at least need to be > protected but simple handlers like > "onSaveComplete()" and friends would really improve this overall framework. > > -- > http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors -- http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors
