It was probably a premature move, though the sample will likely require Roo
trunk pretty soon. In the meantime, does it work okay if you bump the
requirement down to Roo 1.1M3?

rjrjr

On Aug 28, 2010 7:45 AM, "tc" <[email protected]> wrote:
> Commit r8664 updated the expenses sample to use the Roo 1.1M4
> annotations jar which does not exist in the maven repos. The only way
> to get that jar currently is to build roo and doing a manual import
> into a local maven repo? Is this the intent or should it be fixed?
>
> --
> http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors

-- 
http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors

Reply via email to