Thanks for looking into this Freeland.

On Wed, Sep 29, 2010 at 10:41 AM, Freeland Abbott <[email protected]>wrote:

> Yep, I'm looking (and apologies!).  I'm planning to force-correct svn
> first, then troll over the logs to see what went wrong.
>
> I did recently update the script (to support merge metadata for branch
> integrations), but that... shouldn't... have affected the textual content of
> any given mirror, especially one that wasn't a cross-branch copy/merge....
>
>
>
> On Wed, Sep 29, 2010 at 9:51 AM, Miguel Méndez <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> [+fabbott]
>>
>> Thanks for pointing this out Thomas.
>>
>> @fabbott: can you take a look and see what went on here?  I took a look
>> and can confirm that not all of
>> http://code.google.com/p/google-web-toolkit/source/detail?r=8890 was
>> mirrored over.
>>
>> On Wed, Sep 29, 2010 at 6:21 AM, Thomas Broyer <[email protected]>wrote:
>>
>>> [+Cc: bruce_at_google]
>>>
>>> On Sep 29, 11:03 am, Thomas Broyer <[email protected]> wrote:
>>> > At least r8887 up to r8890 are missing some changes.
>>> >
>>> > The missing changes in r8887 and r8888 break the build; whereas r8890
>>> > just misses the faster function clusterer (and r8889 is in the
>>> > expenses sample which I haven't tried to build)
>>>
>>> D'oh! r8881 is broken too. Haven't checked earlier revisions yet.
>>>
>>> Last svn update was r8871 and it was OK (at least "ant clean dist" was
>>> successful, but maybe some changes were already missing without
>>> causing build errors, similar to r8890)
>>>
>>> --
>>> http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Miguel
>>
>
>


-- 
Miguel

-- 
http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors

Reply via email to