Ah sorry, it's the request members of RequestFactory can now inherit from RequestContext. Will give that a go
If that works, would be pretty sweet On Sat, Oct 2, 2010 at 4:53 PM, Patrick Julien <[email protected]> wrote: > sorry, s/rc/rf/ > > RequestFactory doesn't have create anymore, neither does Request, > which is the problem. > > I'm more than fine with RequestFactory not having it because it gives > the impression your objects are application scope instead of request > scope. But without create on Request, we don't have a good way of > doing this > > On Sat, Oct 2, 2010 at 4:52 PM, Patrick Julien <[email protected]> wrote: >> On Sat, Oct 2, 2010 at 4:41 PM, BobV <[email protected]> wrote: >>> On Sat, Oct 2, 2010 at 1:56 PM, Patrick Julien <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> This assumes that the built in persist method works for everyone and >>>> it really, really doesn't. Now we have a serious chicken and egg >>>> problem because our persist methods take the form: >>>> >>>> record persist(credentials, record); >>>> >>>> but now we can't create a record until after we've called persist from >>>> the RequestContext interface >>> >>> I'm assuming from your message that the persist method above is an >>> instance method on your Record domain type. If it's not, just change >>> InstanceRequest to Request and drop the using() call. >> >> It's not, it's a method, non-static, of service object. >> >> >>> >>> interface RecordService extends RequestContext { >>> // < instance type, return type > >>> InstanceRequest<RecordProxy, RecordProxy> persist(CredentialsProxy >>> credentials, RecordProxy record); >>> } >>> >>> interface MyFactory extends RequestFactory { >>> RecordService recordService(); >>> } >>> >>> RecordService svc = rf.recordService(); >>> RecordProxy record = rf.create(RecordProxy.class); >>> CredentialsProxy cred = rf.create(CredentialsProxy.class); >>> svc.persist(cred, record).using(record).to(new Receiver()).fire(); >>> >>> >> >> That doesn't work because rc.create() is gone. Otherwise, yeah, it's great >> > -- http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors
